Re: [bug-libmatheval] LGPL license possible?

[Aleksandar Samardžić]

On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 09:14:10PM -0400, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> 
> I found this reference:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5419923/can-gpl-be-re-licensed
> 
> which supports my guess that you are free to license it under the LGPL as
> far as your code extends.

I was in touch over e-mail with Karl Berry in the meantime, and I got
the clarification: basically, FSF probably wouldn't be willing to
re-license, but what you mentioned above is correct - I can re-license
it on my own.  However, given the fact mentioned in my first message -
that I'm stepping down as maintainer - I decided I wouldn't be willing
to do so at the moment.  I'm sorry for this, but I hope you can utilize
some of other alike publicly available libraries, that may have
licensing terms that are more convenient for using by CFEngine.

Regards,
Alex