[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
next steps for inetutils?
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
next steps for inetutils? |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Feb 2021 16:19:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> I'm ok with doing a release now.
I pushed out a stable release now. Let's see if we get more testing
than for the pre-releases; we can always release something in the coming
weeks/month to fix build/portability stuff. There isn't a lot of
testing on BSD, Solaris, AIX and other non-GNU systems as far as I know.
I wasn't able to update the NEWS section on savannah, maybe we don't use
that? If not, I'll fix README-release.
Now is a good time to do some changes that I think we should do but was
pending the release, any thoughts on the following?
* arp tool
* nc (netcat) tool
* fix all warnings with autoconf 2.71 - I didn't want to touch this
before 2.0 since we had succesful build reports, but there are plenty
of old m4 constructs that we should use gnulib tools for instead.
* use gitlog-to-changelog instead of manual ChangeLog entries
* enhance man pages so they fully supersede NetKit and BSD man pages
* generally use gnulib for portability more than we use today.
- gnulib has fts.c that we have a custom libls/ for
- getaddrinfo/getnameinfo with IDN support to simplify IDN complexity
- more system header files replacements
- ruserok/wtmp stuff
* Mingw/cygwin support?
* Remove Kerberos V4 support? I'm not sure there are any usable
Kerberos V4 implementations around anymore, and it is is
single-DES-only so they are completely insecure anyway.
Please add more stuff! Or disagree.
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: inetutils, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/04
- next steps for inetutils?,
Simon Josefsson <=