Re: happy hacking welcome to tim rühsen

[Tim Rühsen]

On 04.04.20 23:14, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Sorry, lost the ball on this -- stuff.
> 
> I've pushed the entries for the ChangeLog, I suggest that Mats-Erik
> amends them accordingly if he feels they could be improved.
> 
> Which patch went with which CVE?

Thanks,

my question in a prior email was this:
"Regarding mentioning a "CVE tag": Who is going to retrieve a CVE number
? Or has it been done already ?"

IMO, the fixed bugs were so obvious for years (gcc even warns about them
when building), that I wouldn't care about s CVEs. Some downstream
managers might want to have a CVE as it helps their organization - and
they are free to do so.

Regards, Tim

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature