[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: happy hacking welcome to tim rühsen

From: Tim Rühsen
Subject: Re: happy hacking welcome to tim rühsen
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 23:22:35 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 04.04.20 23:14, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Sorry, lost the ball on this -- stuff.
> I've pushed the entries for the ChangeLog, I suggest that Mats-Erik
> amends them accordingly if he feels they could be improved.
> Which patch went with which CVE?


my question in a prior email was this:
"Regarding mentioning a "CVE tag": Who is going to retrieve a CVE number
? Or has it been done already ?"

IMO, the fixed bugs were so obvious for years (gcc even warns about them
when building), that I wouldn't care about s CVEs. Some downstream
managers might want to have a CVE as it helps their organization - and
they are free to do so.

Regards, Tim

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]