[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] [SCM] GNU Inetutils ... inetutils-1_8-126-ge18e45f
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] [SCM] GNU Inetutils ... inetutils-1_8-126-ge18e45f |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:53:59 -0400 |
> I agree -- is there any reason we really need autoconf 2.68 instead of
> 2.67? My system is a Debian Squeeze as well, so I only have 2.67
> installed.
>
> It was what I had installed (I install everything from source in
> $HOME/local so..), so I picked that. I'll lower it to 2.67 if that is
> fine with everyone.
Observe that "configure.ac" only stipulates "AC_PREREQ(2.59)".
The leap to "2.67" is still questionably large.
Ok, 2.59 it is. I don't have an opinion about it, personally I would
prefer the latest, but if others find that cumbersome then we can use
whatever people wish to use.