[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER |
Date: |
Thu, 21 May 2009 15:09:03 +0300 |
Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> What are your thoughts on a BSD_ME_HARDER enviroment variable? We
> could leave it on by default, and if you set it to nil, then you would
> get GNUish behaviour.
I don't quite understand its semantics. E.g. what will BSD_ME_HARDER=0
and BSD_ME_HARDER=1 mean? And what is the default, when BSD_ME_HARDER
is undefined (i.e. what you call "GNUish behaviour")?
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, (continued)
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/05/19
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/19
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/05/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Jeff Bailey, 2009/05/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/05/20
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Jeff Bailey, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/22
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Karl Berry, 2009/05/21
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/22
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Karl Berry, 2009/05/22
- Re: [bug-inetutils] ping, --count=NUMBER, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/23