bug-inetutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing


From: Alfred M. Szmidt
Subject: Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:29:12 +0200 (CEST)

   >>    So where is the prototype for add_history coming from in
   >>    Inetutls?  Should not we refer to history.h and/or -lhistory
   >>    too as just as we do for readline.h and -lreadline?

   > C never required that you need to specify a prototype for a
   > function.  Try enabling warnings, and you will see.

   That is true. What I meant was should we #include
   <readline/history.h> and/or enable warnings?

Yes.

   >>    Or in other terms why should we check for add_history in both
   >>    libreadline _and_ libhistory?

   > Because add_history is can be part of another library.

   "another" or "either" ?

Yes.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]