bug-inetutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing


From: Alfred M. Szmidt
Subject: Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:45:50 +0200 (CEST)

   So where is the prototype for add_history coming from in Inetutls?
   Should not we refer to history.h and/or -lhistory too as just as we
   do for readline.h and -lreadline?

C never required that you need to specify a prototype for a function.
Try enabling warnings, and you will see.

   Secondly, is it possible for add_history to be in libreadline.so
   instead of libhistory.so on GNU systems? 

It might, but there is no guarantee.

   Or in other terms why should we check for add_history in both
   libreadline _and_ libhistory?

Because add_history is can be part of another library.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]