Re: [bug-inetutils] Using argp_failure.

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   > Wouldn't it be better to use argp_error in those parts?  Or do
   > those actually do parsing?

   No. According to the manual, argp_error is for handling parsing
   errors, while argp_failure is for other things like illegal values,
   etc.. In any case argp_error also needs the 'struct argp_state
   *state' pointer.

Hm, What about using argp children?  And changing for example
changeif.c into a argp child, the same for system/*.  The manual
should have some examples, and documentation.

You sure did pick one of the most complex programs to work on...