[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
how about ifconfig?
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
how about ifconfig? |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2000 03:06:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.1.4i |
Hi,
I am working on a simple ifconfig for the Hurd, but I try to write it
portable, so it can be used also on Linux and BSD. How about including it in
ineutils, it seems to be the right place, isn't it?
A lot of advanced features of other systems will be missing in early
versions, but so what. Is ifconfig the best name? Are there de-facto
standards in options or output? It's long ago I looked at bsd systems
last time. I don't like the linux ifconfig, it's messy.
Currently:
address@hidden:~/gnu/cvs/i/ifconfig$ ./ifconfig
lo:
inet address 127.0.0.1
netmask 255.0.0.0
flags UP LOOPBACK RUNNING
mtu 3904
dummy0:
inet address 192.168.0.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
flags UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP
brdaddr 192.168.0.255
mtu 1500
address@hidden:~/gnu/cvs/i/ifconfig$ ./ifconfig --help
Usage: ifconfig [OPTION] ...
Configure network interfaces.
-i, --interface NAME Configure network interface NAME
-a, --address ADDR Set interface address to ADDR
-m, --netmask MASK Set netmask to MASK
--help Display this help and exit
-V, --version Output version information and exit
Submit bug reports to <address@hidden>.
(this is at a *very* early stage, suggestions are welcome, but nothing too
fancy for now, if you aren't going to do the work :)
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
- how about ifconfig?,
Marcus Brinkmann <=