[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] remove pth issue
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] remove pth issue |
Date: |
Mon, 30 May 2022 22:22:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Applied, thanks!
Guy-Fleury Iteriteka, le lun. 30 mai 2022 22:01:05 +0200, a ecrit:
> ---
> open_issues/pth.mdwn | 28 ----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 open_issues/pth.mdwn
>
> diff --git a/open_issues/pth.mdwn b/open_issues/pth.mdwn
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 12bf509..0000000
> --- a/open_issues/pth.mdwn
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
> -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation,
> -Inc."]]
> -
> -[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
> -id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify
> this
> -document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
> or
> -any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
> Invariant
> -Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the
> license
> -is included in the section entitled
> -[[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
> -
> -[[!tag open_issue_porting]]
> -
> -IRC, unknown channel, unknown date.
> -
> - <azeem> seems pth still doesn't work
> - <bddebian> Doesn't build or doesn't work?
> - <azeem> both
> - <azeem> some configure test keep grinding the CPU, same for the test
> suite
> - <azeem> which apparently runs pth_init() and never returns
> -
> - <azeem> actually, pth fails to build right now
> - <azeem> pth_mctx.c:477: error: request for member '__pc' in something
> not a structure or union
> -
> - <azeem> I know the pth test suite fails (it locks up the machine) or
> used to fail, so I guess porting work for pth would be needed
> - <azeem> < marcusb> from reading the pth/PORTING document, porting libpth
> shouldn't be too hard...
> -
> - <youpi> dropped pth [from the channel's topic], as we think we know why
> it fails (sigaltstack is bogus)
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
--
Samuel
---
Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse !
Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.