[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 3/3] XXX: Reimplement gscope
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 3/3] XXX: Reimplement gscope |
Date: |
Sat, 15 May 2021 16:23:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Sergey Bugaev, le dim. 09 mai 2021 16:54:04 +0300, a ecrit:
> diff --git a/sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h b/sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h
> index 4604d00b..af16162f 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h
> @@ -1324,10 +1324,8 @@ link_map_audit_state (struct link_map *l, size_t index)
> }
> #endif /* SHARED */
>
> -#if THREAD_GSCOPE_IN_TCB
> void __thread_gscope_wait (void) attribute_hidden;
> # define THREAD_GSCOPE_WAIT() __thread_gscope_wait ()
> -#endif
Mmm, your patch 1/3 should keep THREAD_GSCOPE_IN_TCB then and only add
THREAD_GSCOPE_LINK_MAP. This 3/3 is the real patch that removes the
THREAD_GSCOPE_IN_TCB flag, as in replacing the only implementation that
was still using it.
> + again:
> + if (atomic_load_acquire (flag_ptr) == THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_UNUSED)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq (flag_ptr,
> + THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_WAIT,
> + THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_USED))
> + goto again;
> +
> + lll_wait (flag_ptr, THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_WAIT, 0);
This is not like the nptl implementation. Better follow the nptl
implementation so both can be maintained likewise (possibly even merged
at some point).
> diff --git a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/tls.h b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/tls.h
> index 057b2613..0ca4e641 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/tls.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/tls.h
> @@ -369,6 +369,28 @@ _hurd_tls_new (thread_t child, struct i386_thread_state
> *state, tcbhead_t *tcb)
> return err;
> }
>
> +/* Global scope switch support. */
> +#define THREAD_GSCOPE_LINK_MAP 0
> +
> +# define THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_UNUSED 0
> +# define THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_USED 1
> +# define THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_WAIT 2
> +
> +#define THREAD_GSCOPE_SET_FLAG() \
> + THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, gscope_flag, THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_USED)
> +
> +#define THREAD_GSCOPE_RESET_FLAG() \
> + ({ \
> + int __flag; \
> + asm volatile ("xchgl %0, %%gs:%P1" \
> + : "=r" (__flag) \
> + : "i" (offsetof (tcbhead_t, gscope_flag)), \
> + "0" (THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_UNUSED)); \
> + if (__flag == THREAD_GSCOPE_FLAG_WAIT) \
> + lll_wake (THREAD_SELF->gscope_flag, GSYNC_BROADCAST); \
Is GSYNC_BROADCAST really needed? AIUI there is only one thread that is
waiting for the wake? Also, use LLL_PRIVATE.
Samuel
- glibc THREAD_GSCOPE and excessive gsync_wake (), Sergey Bugaev, 2021/05/08
- Re: glibc THREAD_GSCOPE and excessive gsync_wake (), Samuel Thibault, 2021/05/08
- Re: glibc THREAD_GSCOPE and excessive gsync_wake (), Sergey Bugaev, 2021/05/08
- Re: glibc THREAD_GSCOPE and excessive gsync_wake (), Samuel Thibault, 2021/05/08
- [RFC PATCH glibc 3/3] XXX: Reimplement gscope, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/05/09
- Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 3/3] XXX: Reimplement gscope,
Samuel Thibault <=
- [RFC PATCH glibc 1/3] XXX: Rename THREAD_GSCOPE_IN_TCB -> THREAD_GSCOPE_LINK_MAP, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/05/09
- [RFC PATCH glibc 2/3] XXX: Move __pthread_threads to ld.so, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/05/09
- Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 2/3] XXX: Move __pthread_threads to ld.so, Samuel Thibault, 2021/05/15
- Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 2/3] XXX: Move __pthread_threads to ld.so, Samuel Thibault, 2021/05/15
[RFC PATCH glibc 0/3] Rewrite THREAD_GSCOPE, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/05/09