[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Aug 2020 01:39:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 03 août 2020 01:33:53 +0200, a ecrit:
> Junling Ma, le dim. 02 août 2020 16:19:39 -0700, a ecrit:
> > You may have missed the part where I say let user side [/dev/irq*]
> > translator
> > do the multiplexing.
>
> I didn't but that looks like extra complexity, and makes the whole thing
> less robust: if the multiplexer gets to die somehow, everything dies.
Also, the kernel will anyway have to support shared irq, for its
own drivers. So let's just reuse this, I don't see why introducing
complexity in userland.
Samuel
- [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface, Junling Ma, 2020/08/02
- Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/02
- Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface, Junling Ma, 2020/08/02
- Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/02
- Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface, Junling Ma, 2020/08/02
- Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/02
- Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface, Junling Ma, 2020/08/02
- Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/02
- Re: [PATCH-1] A new irq device interface, Junling Ma, 2020/08/02