[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by s
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Mar 2019 07:04:55 -0800 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
Svante Signell, le lun. 25 févr. 2019 10:25:01 +0100, a ecrit:
> Unfortunately, the situation has not improved with it :(
>
> The SIGILL failures are now SIGABRT and SIGSEGV as they became with the
> SS_DISABLE patch.
It however seems that the failures are different?
(possibly with much more understandable backtraces)
Samuel
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack,
Samuel Thibault <=