[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 5/6] hurd_add_RPC
From: |
Justus Winter |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 5/6] hurd_add_RPC |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:25:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
alot/0.3.6+ |
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2015-03-05 02:14:38)
> Hello,
>
> Svante Signell, le Thu 22 Jan 2015 10:29:56 +0100, a écrit :
> > +/* Do fcntl type locking on FILE. CMD is from the set
> > + F_GETLK64, F_SETLK64, F_SETLKW64. FLOCK64 is passed
> > + by the user and is as defined by <fcntl.h>. */
> > +routine file_record_lock (
> > + file: file_t;
> > + RPT
> > + cmd: int;
> > + inout flock64: flock_t);
>
> I'm wondering whether we are OK with using the flock_t structure,
> instead of using separate parameters? I don't really have an opinion on
> this, just wondering.
I'm ok with that. We'll have to teach MIG proper structure support
one day anyway.
Justus
signature.asc
Description: signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] hurd_add_RPC,
Justus Winter <=