[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 5/6] hurd_add_RPC
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 5/6] hurd_add_RPC |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Mar 2015 02:14:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Hello,
Svante Signell, le Thu 22 Jan 2015 10:29:56 +0100, a écrit :
> +/* Do fcntl type locking on FILE. CMD is from the set
> + F_GETLK64, F_SETLK64, F_SETLKW64. FLOCK64 is passed
> + by the user and is as defined by <fcntl.h>. */
> +routine file_record_lock (
> + file: file_t;
> + RPT
> + cmd: int;
> + inout flock64: flock_t);
I'm wondering whether we are OK with using the flock_t structure,
instead of using separate parameters? I don't really have an opinion on
this, just wondering.
Samuel
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] hurd_add_RPC,
Samuel Thibault <=