[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Usable translators: nsmux details
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Usable translators: nsmux details |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:45:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.31-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.4.90; x86_64; ; ) |
On Friday 09 July 2010 14:32:52 Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> Yes, you can kill them manually, but nsmux does nothing about dead
> control ports; this memory leak you cannot avoid easily :-(
> Nevertheless, I'd expect that killing translators won't have other bad
> effect than leaving nsmux with invalid control ports: nsmux only uses
> control ports for closing the translators when it itself closes.
But here the size of the memory leak is on the scale of one control port per
started translator, isn’t it? So it would be constantly growing, but not by
that much (as long as nsmux isn’t used for constant querying or similar).
How much is missing to make nsmux close translators again?
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Ein Würfel System - einfach saubere Regeln:
- http://1w6.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Usable translators, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2010/07/09
- Re: Usable translators: nsmux details, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/07/12
- Re: Usable translators: nsmux details, Sergiu Ivanov, 2010/07/13
- Re: Usable translators: nsmux details, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2010/07/13
- Re: Usable translators: nsmux details, Sergiu Ivanov, 2010/07/13
- Re: Usable translators: nsmux details, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/07/23
- Re: Usable translators: nsmux details, Sergiu Ivanov, 2010/07/25
Re: Usable translators, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/10