[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thread model
From: |
Neal H. Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: Thread model |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:50:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:35:56 -0400,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 17:56 +0100, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > At Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:58:57 -0400,
> > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > And throwing a big wrinkle into all that is that many architectures do
> > > not make it *possible* for users to handle page faults. The processor
> > > dumps a load of crap on the stack, and the kernel must preserve it
> > > carefully and then return the fault. It is very hard to encapsulate
> > > that so that it can be stored and restored by users without keeping the
> > > whole stack around.
> >
> > L4 was ported to a large number of architectures; it can't be that
> > hard.
>
> Sparc or i386?
I don't understand the question. [1] shows the architectures that
Pistachio currently supports.
According to [2], there was at least once a Sparc port in the making.
Neal
[1] http://l4ka.org/projects/pistachio/
[2] https://lists.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de/pipermail/l4ka/2004-August/001020.html
- Re: Thread model, (continued)
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/18
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/12
- Re: Thread model, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/03/12
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/12
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/17
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/17
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/18
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model,
Neal H. Walfield <=
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/20
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/17
- Re: Thread model, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/03/17
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/18
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model (was: Ext2 superblock fault), Samuel Thibault, 2008/03/11
- Re: Thread model (was: Ext2 superblock fault), olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/17
- Re: Thread model (was: Ext2 superblock fault), Samuel Thibault, 2008/03/17