[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:48:09 -0500 |
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 02:31 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Okie, I'm fed up with the braindead crap that the Savannah tracker is.
What an extraordinarily differentiated statement of constructive
criticism.
> Always send patches directly to bug-hurd first, when they have been
> discussed, and OKed, _then_ add it to the brain dead pile of shit that
> the Savannah tracker is. Not before, not later. When it has been
> added, to not change it. Consider it as a commit to the CVS, and it
> is there forever. Make a new bug report for the patch, and follow the
> above rules.
>
> Yeah, I'm pissed.
We encourage people to help in any way they can, and if they want to
work within the Savannah tools, then they are welcome to do so. If they
prefer to work via e-mail, that is also good.
Marcus
- Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/13
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/13
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/15
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/15
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/15
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/15
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/15
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/15
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/15
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/01/15
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/01/15
- Re: Patch submission and discussion guidelines, Marco Gerards, 2006/01/15