[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: commit access policies
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: commit access policies |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:17:22 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Sergio Lopez <koro@sinrega.org> writes:
> Alfred, Thomas, I don't know if your getting fun of this, but I think it
> isn't funny at all. Please keep serious.
>
> 1.- Although everybody use gnumach-1-branch, HEAD is oskit-branch. This
> maybe wrong, but it's a maintainer's decission.
Right. If we want to change this, we could. It would require a
discussion about whether the oskit branch, which had always been
intended for the next major release, is to be declared dead (or put on
the long-term back burner). If we make such a decision, then we can
rearrange the branches.
- Re: commit access policies, (continued)
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/14
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/14
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/14
- Re: commit access policies, jemarch, 2005/11/18
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/19
- Re: commit access policies, Sergio Lopez, 2005/11/14
- Re: commit access policies,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/14
- Re: commit access policies, Sergio Lopez, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Marco Gerards, 2005/11/29