[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Glibc without installed headers
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: Glibc without installed headers |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:34:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 05:16:40PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Like, should I be able to build glibc without glibc headers installed.
> > Right now hurd/ and mach/ depend on files that are already installed.
>
> They should depend only on headers install by gcc, and by "make
> install-headers" for mach and hurd.
Well, the Hurd definition files depend on glibc headers: bits/utsname.h in
hurd_types.defs, which sucks in a couple of others. This did hurt me when
compiling glibc, but I forgot where exactly. ioctls.defs also includes
bits/ioctls.h, but I don't remember this being a problem.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- Glibc without installed headers, Jeff Bailey, 2002/07/17
- Re: Glibc without installed headers, Roland McGrath, 2002/07/18
- Re: Glibc without installed headers, Jeff Bailey, 2002/07/18
- Re: Glibc without installed headers, Roland McGrath, 2002/07/18
- Re: Glibc without installed headers,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: Glibc without installed headers, Jeff Bailey, 2002/07/19
- Re: Glibc without installed headers, Roland McGrath, 2002/07/19
- Re: Glibc without installed headers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/07/22
- Re: Glibc without installed headers, Roland McGrath, 2002/07/23
- Re: Glibc without installed headers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/07/23