[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Message passing in user-land
From: |
rreale |
Subject: |
Re: Message passing in user-land |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:26:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +0200, Niels M?ller wrote:
> rreale@iol.it writes:
>
> > But isn't it possible to build a sort of mechanism based on shared memory,
> > thus avoiding the passage across the kernel?
>
> It might be possible to create an ipc mechanism for pure data using
> only shared memory, even if it seems somewhat tricky to make it robust.
But how much performance imprevement would we achieve if we created such
a mechanism, only for pure data?
Roberto
- Message passing in user-land, rreale, 2002/07/15
- Re: Message passing in user-land, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/07/15
- Re: Message passing in user-land, Niels Möller, 2002/07/16
- Re: Message passing in user-land,
rreale <=
- Re: Message passing in user-land, Niels Möller, 2002/07/16
- Re: Message passing in user-land, rreale, 2002/07/16
- Re: Message passing in user-land, James Morrison, 2002/07/16
- Re: Message passing in user-land, rreale, 2002/07/17
- Re: Message passing in user-land, Niels Möller, 2002/07/16
- Re: Message passing in user-land, rreale, 2002/07/17