Re: fakeroot status

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> writes:

> > I'm pretty sure that fakeroot should *not* override identity--for the
> > reason at least that it is *NOT* the same node.
> 
> But it's pretending to be.

It is either indistinguishable, in which case it doesn't need to
exist, or it has *some* difference in semantics--any difference
whatsoever--in which case it should not share the same identity port.

Thomas