Re: ihash_add

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:

> In general, my plan was to read the whole of ihash.c and ponder it, in case
> there are any more bugs.  In fact, we know from the proc bug that the hash
> grows faster then it should: Although the number of processes running at the
> same time remains constant, the hash table grows (otherwise, the broken
> seive code wouldn't have been called).  But I don't have much info about it
> right now.  Part might be due to dead processes that are not reaped.

I though this was just because of bugs in genpid...