[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#70943: linux-libre is not reproducible (regression)
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
bug#70943: linux-libre is not reproducible (regression) |
Date: |
Sun, 26 May 2024 14:15:59 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I've investigated non-determinism in our linux-libre package, which
> sadly appears to have regressed in that regard since I last looked into
> it 3 years ago (see commit 01ea70a29c5c1ded31c37ce8c43192bc1956b2ca
> ("gnu: linux-libre: Make build reproducible.")).
>
> I'm currently seeing these differing files:
>
> $ diff -ql
> /gnu/store/6vx6vkranmggv690ggm79zhdhwvmbji9-linux-libre-6.8.9{,-check}
> Files /gnu/store/6vx6vkranmggv690ggm79zhdhwvmbji9-linux-libre-6.8.9/bzImage
> and
> /gnu/store/6vx6vkranmggv690ggm79zhdhwvmbji9-linux-libre-6.8.9-check/bzImage
> differ
> Common subdirectories:
> /gnu/store/6vx6vkranmggv690ggm79zhdhwvmbji9-linux-libre-6.8.9/lib and
> /gnu/store/6vx6vkranmggv690ggm79zhdhwvmbji9-linux-libre-6.8.9-check/lib
> Common subdirectories:
> /gnu/store/6vx6vkranmggv690ggm79zhdhwvmbji9-linux-libre-6.8.9/share and
> /gnu/store/6vx6vkranmggv690ggm79zhdhwvmbji9-linux-libre-6.8.9-check/share
> Files
> /gnu/store/6vx6vkranmggv690ggm79zhdhwvmbji9-linux-libre-6.8.9/System.map and
> /gnu/store/6vx6vkranmggv690ggm79zhdhwvmbji9-linux-libre-6.8.9-check/System.map
> differ
>
> I'll take a look at what Yocto does differently, if anything.
I didn't see anything special, although some BPF switches got turned on
in the kernel by default in newer 6.X releases, and BPF appears to
introduce non-determinism, accordingy to the Reproducible Builds website
which says this [0]:
Several distributions noticed recent versions of the Linux Kernel are
no longer reproducible because the BPF Type Format (BTF) metadata is
not generated in a deterministic way. This was discussed on the
#reproducible-builds IRC channel, but no solution appears to be in
sight for now.
[0] https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-04/
So it seems there'll need to be some reproducibility work for that
feature in the kernel before it can be resolved (we could also disable
all BPF features, but that seems counter-current at this point in time).
--
Thanks,
Maxim