[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#70239: (operating-system) structure requires a kernel
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#70239: (operating-system) structure requires a kernel |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Apr 2024 14:28:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi,
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
> (operating-system
> (host-name "guix")
> ;; Servers usually use UTC regardless of the location.
> (timezone "Etc/UTC")
> (locale "en_US.utf8")
> (firmware '())
> (initrd-modules '())
> ; (kernel %ct-dummy-kernel)
> (kernel #f)
[...]
> In gnu/services.scm:
> 1031:29 7 (linux-builder-configuration->system-entry _)
> In guix/profiles.scm:
> 439:4 6 (packages->manifest _)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 586:17 5 (map1 (#f))
> In guix/inferior.scm:
> 549:2 4 (loop #f "out" #<promise #<procedure 7f8c96627f98 at gu…>)
> 529:4 3 (inferior-package-input-field #f _)
> 473:18 2 (inferior-package-field #f (compose (lambda (#) (…)) #))
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting
> struct): #f
Indeed, ‘linux-builder-configuration->system-entry’ is not prepared for
that, but we can fix it.
> The (kernel (plain-file "fake-kernel" "")) leads to a different error:
>
> building /gnu/store/idy2sylx9zbvphzlqvhnldjvg242hd2a-linux-modules.drv...
> find-files:
> /gnu/store/jfcbq6djya5pi54yhpvzj66r18h4mp09-dummy-kernel-1/lib/modules: Not a
> directory
> Backtrace:
> 4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/sckm34nzvmkcynhgn6zs5aq6xfs?")
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 619:8 3 (_ #f)
> 626:19 2 (_ #<directory (guile-user) 7ffff77f7c80>)
> 159:9 1 (_ #<directory (guile-user) 7ffff77f7c80>)
> In unknown file:
> 0 (car ())
>
> ERROR: In procedure car:
> In procedure car: Wrong type (expecting pair): ()
I believe this one is a regression introduced in
8f8ec56052766aa5105d672b77ad9eaca5c1ab3c. I believe this is fixed by
this patch:
diff --git a/gnu/system/linux-initrd.scm b/gnu/system/linux-initrd.scm
index 561cfe2fd0..40ff2dc808 100644
--- a/gnu/system/linux-initrd.scm
+++ b/gnu/system/linux-initrd.scm
@@ -134,18 +134,23 @@ (define (flat-linux-module-directory linux modules)
(guix build utils)
(rnrs io ports)
(srfi srfi-1)
- (srfi srfi-26))
+ (srfi srfi-26)
+ (ice-9 match))
(define module-dir
(string-append #$linux "/lib/modules"))
(define builtin-modules
- (call-with-input-file
- (first (find-files module-dir "modules.builtin$"))
- (lambda (port)
- (map file-name->module-name
- (string-tokenize
- (get-string-all port))))))
+ (match (find-files module-dir (lambda (file stat)
+ (string=? (basename file)
+ "modules.builtin")))
+ ((file . _)
+ (call-with-input-file file
+ (lambda (port)
+ (map file-name->module-name
+ (string-tokenize (get-string-all port))))))
+ (_
+ '())))
(define modules-to-lookup
(lset-difference string=? '#$modules builtin-modules))
Could you confirm?
> I think it would be best to just support (kernel #f) for container
> deployments,
> since that would simplify it and keep it manageable.
Yes, let’s do that too.
Thanks,
Ludo’.