[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi
From: |
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) |
Subject: |
bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Apr 2024 20:33:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hello Rostislav.
I do not know how to address the issue properly or where to document it.
The Writing Documentation section is the wrong place, because everyone
has to bootstrap again, not only the one who is writing documentation;
if we put a notice somewhere, then it would be something like:
diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
index f5b01f42fd..2dd4be951f 100644
--- a/doc/contributing.texi
+++ b/doc/contributing.texi
@@ -194,24 +194,28 @@ After updating the repository, @command{make} might fail
with an error
similar to the following example:
@example
error: failed to load 'gnu/packages/linux.scm':
ice-9/eval.scm:293:34: In procedure abi-check: #<record-type <origin>>: record
ABI mismatch; recompilation needed
@end example
This means that one of the record types that Guix defines (in this
example, the @code{origin} record) has changed, and all of guix needs
to be recompiled to take that change into account. To do so, run
@command{make clean-go} followed by @command{make}.
+If after updating, @command{make} fails with another error message,
+you probably have to repeat all steps described here, starting with
+@command{./bootstrap}.
+
@node Running Guix Before It Is Installed
@section Running Guix Before It Is Installed
In order to keep a sane working environment, you will find it useful to
test the changes made in your local source tree checkout without
actually installing them. So that you can distinguish between your
``end-user'' hat and your ``motley'' costume.
To that end, all the command-line tools can be used even if you have not
run @code{make install}. To do that, you first need to have an
environment with all the dependencies available (@pxref{Building from
Git}), and then simply prefix each command with @command{./pre-inst-env}
Would that be OK?
Regards,
Florian
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi, Rostislav Svoboda, 2024/04/02
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi, Efraim Flashner, 2024/04/02
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi, Rostislav Svoboda, 2024/04/02
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2024/04/03
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi, Rostislav Svoboda, 2024/04/03
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2024/04/03
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi, Rostislav Svoboda, 2024/04/04
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi,
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <=
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi, Rostislav Svoboda, 2024/04/05
- bug#70140: Missing ./doc/guix-cookbook.pt_BR.texi, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2024/04/05