[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69129: sbcl-mcclim broke on upgrade to sbcl@2.4.0
From: |
Carlo Zancanaro |
Subject: |
bug#69129: sbcl-mcclim broke on upgrade to sbcl@2.4.0 |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:14:26 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On Sat, Feb 17 2024, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
> I've added copyright header and use version field for commit.
Thanks for that. I feel like this work was entirely mechanical, so I
would have been fine without a copyright header, but I appreciate it.
I'm curious about the version/commit change, though. Given the -yule
suffix on the tag name changes with each version we will still need to
manually update the origin's commit. It feels like unnecessary
indirection to me. What is the benefit to referencing the package's
version in the origin like this?
Carlo
- bug#69129: sbcl-mcclim broke on upgrade to sbcl@2.4.0, Christopher Howard, 2024/02/14
- bug#69129: sbcl-mcclim broke on upgrade to sbcl@2.4.0, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2024/02/15
- bug#69129: sbcl-mcclim broke on upgrade to sbcl@2.4.0, Christopher Howard, 2024/02/15
- bug#69129: sbcl-mcclim broke on upgrade to sbcl@2.4.0, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2024/02/16
- bug#69129: [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-mcclim: Update to 0.9.8., Carlo Zancanaro, 2024/02/17
- bug#69129: [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-mcclim: Update to 0.9.8., Sharlatan Hellseher, 2024/02/17
- bug#69129: [PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: sbcl-mcclim: Reformatting., Carlo Zancanaro, 2024/02/17
- bug#69129: [PATCH v2 1/2] gnu: sbcl-mcclim: Update to 0.9.8., Carlo Zancanaro, 2024/02/17
bug#69129: sbcl-mcclim broke on upgrade to sbcl@2.4.0, Sharlatan Hellseher, 2024/02/17
- bug#69129: sbcl-mcclim broke on upgrade to sbcl@2.4.0,
Carlo Zancanaro <=
bug#69129: sbcl-mcclim broke on upgrade to sbcl@2.4.0, Sharlatan Hellseher, 2024/02/18