[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
bug#68229: go.powerpc64le-linux 1.14.15 fails test suite |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:53:15 +0200 |
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:29:50AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> cuirass@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
>
> > <p>The build <b>go.powerpc64le-linux</b> for specification <b>master</b> is
> > broken. You can find the detailed information about this build <a
> > href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details">here</a>.</p>
> >
> > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3139760/details
>
> The test failure is:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> --- FAIL: TestScript (0.00s)
> --- FAIL: TestScript/vendor_complex (2.07s)
> script_test.go:193:
> # smoke test for complex build configuration (1.990s)
> > go build -o complex.exe complex
> > [exec:gccgo] go build -compiler=gccgo -o complex.exe complex
> [stderr]
> # complex
> gccgo: error: unrecognized command-line option
> '-rpath=/gnu/store/qj6cnccz6vsffqa32rviw4zaqgh7xd6q-gcc-11.3.0-lib/lib'
> [exit status 2]
> FAIL: testdata/script/vendor_complex.txt:5: unexpected command
> failure
>
> FAIL
> FAIL cmd/go 46.068s
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I don't see an obvious relationship with the recent commit touching
> gccgo-12, but I'm CC'ing its author in case it could be.
This one is go-1.14. That one already failed for ppc64le.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature