[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#65979: incorrect “guix hash” for FastQC
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
bug#65979: incorrect “guix hash” for FastQC |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Oct 2023 17:24:47 +0200 |
Hi,
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 at 17:07, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> My take is that it’s OK to keep ‘vcs-file?’ as is: the best we could do
> >> would be to add complicated heuristics in the hope corner cases like
> >> this one would be better dealt with, but it wouldn’t be bullet-proof
> >> anyway.
> >
> > Well, the question is what other VCS as 'svn-fetch', etc. are doing?
>
> Remove the relevant metadata directory/directories.
What does it mean "relevant"? :-)
Where do I have to look to implement the exact same behaviour of what
do the fetch methods?
> Now, SWH does not use ‘guix hash’ (I suppose) so they’ll have to address
> that on their side (in Python code I guess).
Yes for sure. It does not change the fact that "guix hash" has a bug.
Cheers,
simon