[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#42141: blast+ is not reproducible
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
bug#42141: blast+ is not reproducible |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Sep 2022 17:20:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 at 23:09, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337.
>>>
>>> Yay! Thank you! And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build
>>> farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'?
>>>
>>> That is odd.
>>
>> Because blast+ is multi-outputs and ’out’ is fine contrary to ’include’:
>>
>> $ guix challenge blast+:include
>> /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include contents
>> differ:
>> local hash: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x
>>
>> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include:
>> 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x
>>
>> https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include:
>> 0cakizfsqb1lla62cmwnng1h9gvqgf3lyjk0k7lkiaisj713mpzx
>> differing files:
>> /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
>> /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h
>>
>> 1 store items were analyzed:
>> - 0 (0.0%) were identical
>> - 1 (100.0%) differed
>> - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
>
> Ah, thanks for explaining!
Ah! Shouldn't the default be to compare all outputs? It seems that'd
be less surprising and useful.
What do you think?
--
Maxim