[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
bug#52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:02 -0500 |
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:28:17PM +0100, Erik Winkels wrote:
> When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as
> a user package I get this error:
>
> ```
> $ guix package --list-installed
> [...]
> gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32
>
> $ guix install flatpak
> The following package will be installed:
> flatpak 1.12.1
> guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg
> guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30
> /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30
> guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1
> guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32
> /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32
> hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from
> the profile.
Thanks for the report. This is fallout from the fix for
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52483>, where GnuPG 2.2.30 was released
with significant bugs and we didn't notice until we'd already deployed
it for users.
Unfortunately, gnupg-2.2.30 has ~2400 dependent packages:
------
$ guix refresh -l gnupg@2.2.30
Building the following 1324 packages would ensure 2425 dependent packages are
rebuilt: [...]
------
So, we can't upgrade it directly on the master branch.
I'll look into upgrading Flatpak's dependency on GnuPG.
> Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG
> installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped
> working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's
> GnuPG was the culprit.
Oof :(