[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG
From: |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice |
Subject: |
bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:21:57 +0100 |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 写道:
I'm looking into this now.
So I've installed Retroarch on Debian.
They patch[0] it to hide the Updater by default but it's trivial
to reënable (tested):
$ echo 'menu_show_core_updater = "false"' >> \
~/.config/retroarch/retroarch.cfg
This does not appease me. I'm implementing more incisive
measures.
Thoughts? Am I an anti-choice extremist?
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]:
https://sources.debian.org/patches/retroarch/1.7.3+dfsg1-1/01_config.patch/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG, (continued)
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG, Jesse Gibbons, 2019/11/26
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2019/11/27
- bug#38360: Retroarch does violate FSDG, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/11/27
- bug#38360: Retroarch does violate FSDG, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2019/11/28
- bug#38360: Retroarch does violate FSDG, Mark H Weaver, 2019/11/29
- bug#38360: Retroarch does violate FSDG, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2019/11/30
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG, Nicolò Balzarotti, 2019/11/27
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2019/11/28
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/28
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/11/28
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <=
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/11/29
- bug#38360: Retroarch might violate FSDG, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2019/11/29
- bug#38360: [PATCH] gnu: retroarch: Disable Online Updater [FSDG fix]., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/11/29
- bug#38360: [PATCH] gnu: retroarch: Disable Online Updater [FSDG fix]., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/11/30