bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system


From: brettg
Subject: bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 22:16:43 +0100
User-agent: Posteo Webmail



On 19.11.2019 22:14, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Hello Brett,

Thank you for the heads-up concerning the latest changes to the way
Emacs find its libraries and the adjustments done to the
emacs-build-system.

address@hidden writes:

On 19.11.2019 01:32, address@hidden wrote:
On 19.11.2019 01:27, address@hidden wrote:
On 18.11.2019 22:34, address@hidden wrote:
On 18.11.2019 21:33, address@hidden wrote:
On 18.11.2019 21:28, address@hidden wrote:
On 18.11.2019 20:01, address@hidden wrote:
Hey all, the recent changes to the emacs build system result in
a few
broken packages like emacs-pdf-tools, or basically anything
that uses
a phase for emacs-set-emacs-load-path.

For example, I borrowed the technique used by emacs-pdf-tools to
package emacs-telega, resulting in both packages failing to build:

Here is the code for emacs-telega:

https://git.sr.ht/~brettgilio/cfg/tree/master/channel/non-gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm#L99

The issue is in this phase for both emacs-pdf-tools and my
channel package:

 (add-after 'compress-documentation 'emacs-set-emacs-load-path
                          (assoc-ref emacs:%standard-phases 
'set-emacs-load-path))

Resulting in:

starting phase `emacs-set-emacs-load-path'
Backtrace:
           5 (primitive-load
"/gnu/store/5b1p1gsvfyi4fbx4s42rhab2dns…")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
   191:35  4 (_ _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
    829:9  3 (catch _ _ #<procedure 7ffff3bbb518 at
/gnu/store/zmkg…> …)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
   863:16  2 (every1 #<procedure 7ffff30ae160 at
/gnu/store/zmkgrvv…> …)
In
/gnu/store/zmkgrvvhmrix2b1z7id6zrg9bb7qxzdl-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm:
   839:30  1 (_ _)
In unknown file:
           0 (_ #:source
"/gnu/store/qw8xbmk6ryl9a2jrp0gip3yffmsdix…" …)

ERROR: Wrong type to apply: #f

Sorry for failing to foresee this problem.  I've fixed the couple
packages that were impacted on master now.  You can have a look at the
fixes (they are fairly simple).

If we suspect that changes are going to be non-backwards
compatible
could we use the news system to pass along that message? Much
appreciated. Thanks.

Brett Gilio

I applied a hotfix to the package by replacing 'set-emacs-load-path
with 'add-source-to-load-path. I believe this fix would work for
all
other affected packages.

https://git.sr.ht/~brettgilio/cfg/commit/c24a6db9d25151c487e9db675bd74e4bb3912173

Indeed!

Ricardo, just wanted to make you aware that this emacs-build-system
change does break your guile-studio. I discovered this because I
adopted some of your ideas of autoloading in the generated emacs lisp from guile-studio when creating my own emacs configuration dependent
on guix, which resulted in

progn: Wrong number of arguments: (lambda nil "Autoload Emacs
packages
found in EMACSLOADPATH.

'Autoload' means to load the 'autoloads' files matching
`guix-emacs-autoloads-regexp'." (interactive) (let* ((emacs-load-path
(getenv "EMACSLOADPATH")) (emacs-non-core-load-path-directories
(seq-filter (function (lambda (dir) (string-match-p
"/share/emacs/site-lisp" dir))) (split-string emacs-load-path ":")))
(autoloads (mapcan (function guix-emacs-find-autoloads)
emacs-non-core-load-path-directories))) (mapc (function (lambda (f)
(load f (quote noerror)))) autoloads))), 78

I'll let you know if I can find any fix for this when I get some
time.
But just wanted to pass the message along.

Brett

I tried removing the arguments passed to
`guix-emacs-autoload-packages' as the updated version
(http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/aux-files/emacs/guix-emacs.el?id=47b3b4c2aa49e21f4cc32c97ff7bbbd069bb849c)
does not carry arguments anymore, instead depending on a variable
EMACSLOADPATH. However, whenever that is done it returns

split-string: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil

possibly because my system is not finding EMACSLOADPATH.

Yes, that's the reason. Perhaps it could be worthwhile to give a better
message in this condition, but it's unclear to me why this condition
would arise at all.  Would you mind giving some more background to how
you got into that situation?  I'll try building guile-studio and see if
I could get a hint or two.

I will keep investigating.

I can confirm, when running something analogous to `guix environment
--ad-hoc emacs-dashboard` no changes are being made to the
$GUIX_ENVIRONMENT/etc/profile to resemble EMACSLOADPATH.

So I have investigated the issue with EMACSLOADPATH: Similar to
Ricardo's guile-studio,
my package enlign was using the autoload function from guix-emacs.el
to propagate a list
of packages called from inputs to be loaded with the start of emacs.

I have since revised this to just call the autoload function directly,
no longer passing any arguments, and had to modify my enlign package
to respect the EMACSLOADPATH variable. This is only possible if all of
the packages are passed as propagated-inputs though, which is less
than desirable in my opinion (though I am willing to be convinced.)

Is your package an Emacs library/package? If so, just defining the other
Elisp dependencies of this package as propagated inputs would be the
correct solution.

For other cases (I can't think of how that would work exactly), perhaps
wrapping the package's script with the computed EMACSLOADPATH
environment variable could do?

This additionally leads to having to require emacs as a propagated
input as well, as leading it native or regular input leads to an error
with emacs not recognizing simple.el or mule-util.

Do you mean, that your package somehow uses Emacs without having Emacs
installed in the profile (not being propagated)?  If this is the case,
wrapping your program with EMACSLOADPATH (and patching its reference to
Emacs) should work, without having to propagate anything.

Overall, I am not sure if I like the recent change to guix-emacs.el. I
understand where the incentive is to do this, but ultimately it seems
to lead to more headache when creating packages around emacs.

https://git.sr.ht/~brettgilio/cfg/commit/47bc9ae544ba10c0cacef1435625dcb0114e8cf5

Anyways,

If there is no other comment, this issue really just needs to fix
emacs-pdf-tools and other affected packages from the recent string of
changes.

I'm sorry you've had some problems with this recent change!  Thanks for
bringing them out. Please do continue, I'm interested to know about any
remaining issues you might find.

Maxim

Thank you for your work Maxim, I think most of them are resolved now. I do wonder about what prompted the change, though. Perhaps you might share?

Brett





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]