[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error: |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:23:58 +0100 |
Hi Kai,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 12:19, Kai Mertens <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:14:07 +0100
> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Here’s a trick to do that (for commit 57c7bfec6, on x86_64-linux):
>
> hmm, I am on i686 – is the trick still applicable?
> I will switch to root’s profile with “sudo -i”, but that is ok, right?
> (If you please send your OK – then I will try it...)
I think the evaluation [1] should do the job for i686.
[1] https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1943561/details
> I guess I cannot use a simple “sudo -i guix package -u guix” as a
> workaround for the failing “sudo -i guix pull”, as it would bring up
> the same issue?
The issue you encounter comes from a compatibility break in Guix. Four
years later (more or less I guess), inferiors has bee introduced in
Guix. They allow to go back and forward with "guix pull --commit=".
Well, other said, your version of Guix is too old to be updated using
the usual way.
The only way is to apply the Ludo's "trick". If I understand well:
1. Fetch a recent enough derivation of Guix
2. Build this derivation with your old Guix
3. Manually pull to populate the store
4. Then the profile ~/.config/guix/ should be ok
> Oh, I don't feel competent enough to give ideas, but “pull --rescue”
> sounds too generic to me. Maybe there will be other use cases that will
> require a (different) rescue trick in future. Instead, your commit
> 9c9982dc0 suggests a “pull --substitute-missing-derivations” to me.
If I understand well, your version of Guix is too old to use the
feature described in commit 9c9982dc0.
And if I still understand correctly, "pull --rescue" should be
mechanism to easily update an old Guix (before the overhaul in 0.15.0)
instead of doing all the dance.
All the best,
simon
- bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, Kai Mertens, 2019/11/15
- bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/17
- bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, Kai Mertens, 2019/11/18
- bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, zimoun, 2019/11/18
- bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/18
- bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, zimoun, 2019/11/18
- bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/18
- bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, zimoun, 2019/11/19
- bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/20
bug#38226: guix pull: error: build failed: [...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:20: Syntax error:, Kai Mertens, 2019/11/20