[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally buil
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:59:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I think what needs to be done is the following:
>>>
>>> (1) commit 78ced7975b0665e810834391d826c9f0ef7277e1 on 'wip-binaries'
>>> should be reverted, to downgrade mescc-tools to the 0.5.2 release.
>>>
>>> (2) The 'wip-binaries' tarballs should be uploaded to a new subdirectory
>>> of <https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/i686-linux/>, along
>>> with digital signatures, of course. I'm talking about these in
>>> particular:
>>>
>>> 3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b
>>> guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a
>>> linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330
>>> mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0
>>> mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>> c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7
>>> static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
>>>
>>> (3) The following bootstrap packages in 'core-updates' bootstrap.scm
>>> should be updated to use the new binaries above:
>>>
>>> (a) %bootstrap-linux-libre-headers
>>> (b) %bootstrap-mescc-tools
>>> (c) %bootstrap-mes
>>>
>>> (4) Berlin should start rebuilding 'core-updates'.
>>>
>>> If desired, steps (3) and (4) could come before (2) if someone
>>> temporarily uploads the new binaries somewhere else, and adjusts
>>> '%bootstrap-base-urls' accordingly. The key is for the hashes and file
>>> names to match what we've agreed on here, as I listed in (2) above.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> Thank you for the excellent summary. I can look into adjusting the bash
>> fix for 5.0, and updating the bootstrap binary URLs and hashes. I will
>> do this in a 'core-updates-next' branch. I would also like to merge
>> wip-binaries into it as a final step, unless someone has objections.
>>
>> Ludovic should be back in a couple of days and can hopefully take care
>> of the uploads.
>
> I haven’t quite caught up yet, but I trust you and I can upload the
> files that Mark mentions above to ftp.gnu.org this time (Ricardo should
> also be able to upload them, if needed.)
>
> How can I reproduce them or fetch them?
You can reproduce them with the following command from a git checkout at
commit 9e6256ba0f32ab12d61c914a3fed879dac881762, which is the tip of the
'wip-binaries' branch, based on recent 'master':
./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux bootstrap-tarballs
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ git describe
v1.0.1-2479-g9e6256ba0f
mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux
bootstrap-tarballs
/gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0
mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ cd
/gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0
mhw@jojen /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0$
sha256sum *
3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b
guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz
1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a
linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz
021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330
mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz
fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0
mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz
c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7
static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Do you get the same results?
To match what 'core-updates-next' expects, it would be good to upload
the files above, along with digital signatures, to the following new
directory:
https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/i686-linux/20190815/
>> Ricardo: can you instruct Cuirass to add a reduced jobset for
>> 'core-updates-next', that only builds builds the "core" package subset?
>
> Should be ready now:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-next
Thank you.
> However, evaluation fails with:
>
> Backtrace:
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1188:25 19 (bag->derivation #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<?> ?)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 592:29 18 (map1 (("source" #<origin ("http://fossies.org/lin?>) ?))
> 592:17 17 (map1 (("bash" #<package bash-minimal@4.4.23 gnu/p?>) ?))
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 979:16 16 (expand-input #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<pac?> ?)
> 936:16 15 (cache! #<weak-table 2/113> #<package bash-minimal@4.4?> ?)
> 1255:22 14 (thunk)
> 1188:25 13 (bag->derivation #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<?> ?)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 592:29 12 (map1 (("source" #<origin "mirror://gnu/bash/bash-?>) ?))
> 592:17 11 (map1 (("gcc" #<package gcc@5.5.0 gnu/packages/boo?>) ?))
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 979:16 10 (expand-input #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<pac?> ?)
> 936:16 9 (cache! #<weak-table 2/113> #<package gcc@5.5.0 gnu/pa?> ?)
> 1255:22 8 (thunk)
> 1188:25 7 (bag->derivation #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<?> ?)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 592:29 6 (map1 (("source" #<origin "mirror://gnu/gcc/gcc-5.?>) ?))
> 592:17 5 (map1 (("texinfo" #<package texinfo@6.5 gnu/packag?>) ?))
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 979:16 4 (expand-input #<store-connection 256.99 2860c60> #<pac?> ?)
> 936:16 3 (cache! #<weak-table 2/113> #<package texinfo@6.5 gnu/?> ?)
> 1255:22 2 (thunk)
> 1188:25 1 Exception thrown while printing backtrace:
> Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#<condition &message [message:
> "texinfo-perl-compat.patch: patch not found"] 56ac3c0>)'.
>
> srfi/srfi-1.scm:592:17: In procedure map1:
> Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#<condition &message [message:
> "texinfo-perl-compat.patch: patch not found"] 51bb5c0>)'.
>
> Am I missing something?
The string "texinfo-perl-compat" does not occur in the current
'core-updates-next' branch on Savannah, which is at commit
82eaac49ac983f28768d6623d802f41cbd7f779b.
However, that file name _was_ present in an older version of
'core-updates-next', before it was deleted on Savannah at some time in
the past. I know this because I checked out 'core-updates-next' from
another one of my computers, and found that it was actually at commit
89e7f90d0b40bc4f15f902cc3b82c3effa87dd02 from last November. I ran "git
fetch" and "git reset --hard origin/core-updates-next" to fix it, but
maybe there's a better way.
How is this kind of issue normally dealt with? Is there a git cache in
Cuirass that can be cleaned?
Thanks,
Mark
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, (continued)
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Marius Bakke, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/14
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Marius Bakke, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/15
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/16
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/17
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/08/16
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones,
Mark H Weaver <=
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/08/17
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/17
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/08/18
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/20
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/21
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/08/21
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/21
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/08/22
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/08/24
- bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones, Mark H Weaver, 2019/08/24