[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25976: man page version is outdated in Guix 0.12.0 tarball
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#25976: man page version is outdated in Guix 0.12.0 tarball |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:45:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden> skribis:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> Alex Vong <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> The man page version in Guix 0.12.0 tarball[0] is outdated. When running
>>>>
>>>> $ man guix
>>>>
>>>> the name of the man page is
>>>>
>>>> guix - manual page for guix 0.11.0
>>>>
>>>> I think it was forgotten to be updated during the 0.12.0 release.
>>>>
>>>> [0]: https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-0.12.0.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think we should add the generated man pages to the
>>> MAINTAINERCLEANFILES Automake variable and document the release process
>>> in a "README-release" file which should contain running 'make
>>> maintainer-clean'.
>>
>> The process is currently documented here:
>>
>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/tree/doc/release.org
>
> Oops I have overlooked that.
>
>> Would it work to have ‘distcheck’ depend on ‘maintainer-clean’? That
>> would be even better.
>
> Unfornately 'maintainer-clean' is removing the current Makefile so it
> can't be used as a prerequisite.
>
> I guess we can't do better that just adding a step for 'make
> maintainer-clean' before 'make distcheck' in the release documentation.
OK, makes sense. Could you add it?
> While reading "doc/release.org" I have realized it doesn't speak about
> fetching and committing the latest translations from the Translation Project.
We usually fetch them any time we get a translation update notification
on the mailing list, which I think is equivalent no?
Thanks,
Ludo’.