bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#22626: Postgres service fails on adding user


From: Christopher Allan Webber
Subject: bug#22626: Postgres service fails on adding user
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:44:16 -0800
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.1

Ludovic Courtès writes:

> Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Heya all... guix system config attached.  I tried doing a guix system
>> reconfigure and it failboat'ed.  Here's what happened:
>>
>>   adding user 'postgres'...
>>   useradd: group 'postgres' does not exist
>
> Normally just above that there should be:
>
>   adding group 'postgres'
>
> Could it be that adding the group silently failed?  What does /etc/group
> shows?

Well, it looks like it does do that.  I didn't show my full output
because there's a lot of garbage... maybe it turns out that this garbage
is related:

The following derivation will be built:
   /gnu/store/kil0p7xg6qrvvkf3mp0j0xii09s1cqx7-grub.cfg.drv
/gnu/store/qsgrb7inl2mkrnccxf524faqax63dbs4-system
/gnu/store/1b31ydr0yrc3jdl6i4chaccsbapzq0m5-grub.cfg
/gnu/store/sx2xqvr3s033bl60s09zs6jjbs73n791-grub-2.00
activating system...
setting up setuid programs in '/run/setuid-programs'...
populating /etc from /gnu/store/piaczch5x7vczy9z7yjq4z8631rh828p-etc...
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
adding group 'postgres'...
groupadd: existing lock file /etc/group.lock without a PID
groupadd: cannot lock /etc/group; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
adding user 'ntpd'...
useradd: existing lock file /etc/group.lock without a PID
useradd: cannot lock /etc/group; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: no changes
usermod: no changes
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
usermod: existing lock file /etc/shadow.lock without a PID
usermod: cannot lock /etc/shadow; try again later.
adding user 'postgres'...
useradd: group 'postgres' does not exist

Anyway /etc/group does not show postgres but I suppose it wouldn't
without the "guix system reconfigure" succeeding?

> (When testing in ‘guix system vm’, everything works well.)

I can't tell whether or not "guix system vm" would be fine; I assume it
probably would because I got to the point where qemu must have been
invoked, since my system crashed.  See my last bug.

It definitely does not work with "guix system reconfigure" though.







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]