[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?
From: |
Christopher Allan Webber |
Subject: |
bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:26:56 -0600 |
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>> address@hidden
>>> address@hidden:doc
>>>
>>> I’m not sure if we should also allow:
>>>
>>> guile:address@hidden
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> I'm OK with that. Since choosing the reserved characters is not a
>> technical decision, maybe we could poll users?
>
> Yes, why not (bikeshedding ahead! :-)). Would you like to email
> guix-devel about it?
>
> Note that it only affects the CLI. The Emacs and Web UIs won’t see any
> difference.
>
> Ludo’.
If the @ is for the optional choice of including a version, I'm good
with it. It does mean we can never have @ in our package names, but
that might be a good restriction anyway :)
Anyway, I like it, since it's for command-line only.
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, (continued)
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/21
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/21
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/22
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Alex Kost, 2015/12/23
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/30
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/30
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/30
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Efraim Flashner, 2015/12/31
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Alex Kost, 2015/12/31
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/31
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?,
Christopher Allan Webber <=