[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rollback problems
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Rollback problems |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:44:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
> Am Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>> > Having agreed on linear history, it seems that (a) the current
>> > behavior is broken because roll-backs don’t actually follow the
>> > history, as illustrated previously, and (b) the generation from which
>> > we are rolling back must be deleted.
>
> It seems to work: I rolled back from 21 to 20, 19, 18, 17; then removed a
> package and am at 18 now. Then removed another package and arrived at 19,
> where the previous 18 and 19 were overwritten.
Good.
> Personally, I would have deleted all (consecutive) generations starting
> with 19 after the first roll-back and additional package removal; now we
> still have pieces of old history lying around, the (old and) current 20 is
> not a successor of the current 19 any more.
Yeah, I wondered about that and ended up with the approach that’s the
easiest in terms of implementation.
Thanks for testing!
Ludo’.
- Re: Rollback problems, (continued)
- Re: Rollback problems, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/01/24
- Re: Rollback problems, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/01/24
- Re: Rollback problems, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2013/01/25
- Re: Rollback problems, Andreas Enge, 2013/01/25
- Re: Rollback problems, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/01/25
- Re: Rollback problems, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/01/27
- Re: Rollback problems, Andreas Enge, 2013/01/28
- Re: Rollback problems,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Rollback problems, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/01/24
Re: Rollback problems, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/01/27