bug#62729: [PATCH] Fix dangling pointers in `environ'

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi Olivier,

Olivier Dion <olivier.dion@polymtl.ca> skribis:

> From: Olivier Dion <olivier-dion@proton.me>
>
> When calling `environ', Guile set the global variable `environ' to a
> list allocated with the GC.  Strings in it are also allocated with the
> GC.
>
> However, if an user call the Scheme setenv() procedure, the resulting
> call to putenv() in libc might reallocate `environ' to a new pointer
> while copying sub-pointers owned by Guile in it.
>
> This results in the GC marking these strings for reclamation when they
> are actually still present in `environ'.  Thus, the values in the
> environment are now undefined.
>
> To fix this, Guile should only manipulate the `environ' using the
> standard libc functions.  This ensures that concurrent modification of
> it is safe in multi-threaded program.  Therefore, the procedure
> `environ' now call the libc clearenv() procedure to purge the
> environment.  Then, the desired values are put in `environ' using
> scm_putenv().  At the end, no GC allocated memory is put in `environ'.
>
> Also, since `environ' can be changed at anytime in a multi-thread
> program, emit a warning stipulating that the result is undefined
> behavior if multiple threads are created in the program.  Consider for
> example a thread iterating over `environ' while another one do a call to
> putenv().  The latter would do a realloc() on `environ' and thus the old
> array read by the former now contains garbage.
>
> On system where clearenv() is not present, an atomic store of NULL with
> sequential consistency to `environ' should be sufficient but see the
> NOTES of clearenv(3).
>
> * libguile/posix.c (scm_environ): Do not store GC allocated memory in
> environ.

Thanks for the clear explanation and patch.  Finally applied with an
added comment in the code.

Ludo’.