[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#48318: (ice-9 match) does not allow distinguishing between () and #n
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
bug#48318: (ice-9 match) does not allow distinguishing between () and #nil |
Date: |
Sun, 09 May 2021 18:42:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 |
Hi guilers,
I've found the following surprising behaviour:
(use-modules (ice-9 match))
(match (identity #nil) (() 'scheme-eol) (#nil 'elisp-eol))
--> scheme-eol, expected elisp-eol
(match '() (#nil 'elisp-eol) (() 'elisp-eol))
--> elisp-eol, expected scheme-eol
Treating () and #nil as equivalent makes sense, but should be
documented.
My suspicion, currently untested: the following code in
ice-9/match.upstream.scm ...
(define-syntax match-two
(syntax-rules (_ ___ ..1 *** quote quasiquote ? $ = and or not set! get!)
((match-two v () g+s (sk ...) fk i)
(if (null? v) (sk ... i) fk))
[..]
should be:
(define-syntax match-two
(syntax-rules (_ ___ ..1 *** quote quasiquote ? $ = and or not set! get!)
((match-two v () g+s (sk ...) fk i)
(if (eq? v '()) (sk ... i) fk))
((match-two v #nil g+s
(sk ...) fk i)
(if (eq? v #nil) (sk ... i) fk))
[...]
And the following might need similar adjustment:
((match-two v (p) g+s sk fk i)
(if (and (pair? v) (null? (cdr v)))
(let ((w (car v)))
(match-one w p ((car v) (set-car! v)) sk fk i))
fk))
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- bug#48318: (ice-9 match) does not allow distinguishing between () and #nil,
Maxime Devos <=