bug#48098: let/ec compilation bug

[Andy Wingo]

Thanks for the report; fixed!

On Thu 29 Apr 2021 12:48, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.itampe@gmail.com> 
writes:

> Here is an interesting test case that shows that fi we define
> (define-syntax-rule (letec-m f) (let/ec c (f c)))
> (define                    (letec-f f) (let/ec c (f c)))
>
> we can get two different behaviors with letec-m compiles wrongly. Obviously a 
> bug!
>
> This is important in casy you would like to make a loop macro effectively 
> with a continue directive.