[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC? |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 23:18:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
> previously I wrote:
>
>> The “guile-awesome” package finished compiling (after about 46 minutes).
>> I’m now testing “guix pull” with a version of Guix that uses
>> “guile-awesome”.
>
> I’m sure I’m doing something wrong (see below for guesses). Here’s what
> I get:
>
> ./pre-inst-env guix pull
> loading... 26.0% of 645 filesrandom seed for tests: 1509382171
> compiling... 18.9% of 645 filesIn thread:
> ERROR: In procedure return: return used outside of 'with-monad'Error while
> printing exception.
> compiling... 54.7% of 645 files^C
The error above is the other bug you reported, not related (but just as
serious): <https://bugs.gnu.org/27476>.
> I modified build-self.scm to use the modified Guile:
>
> diff --git a/build-aux/build-self.scm b/build-aux/build-self.scm
> index ed8ff5f..9af6504 100644
> --- a/build-aux/build-self.scm
> +++ b/build-aux/build-self.scm
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ running Guile."
> (package->derivation (cond-expand
> (guile-2.2
> (canonical-package
> - (specification->package "address@hidden")))
> + (specification->package "address@hidden")))
> (else
> (canonical-package
> (specification->package "address@hidden"))))))
>
> I also confirmed that the Guile process that is spawned as “bin/guile
> --no-auto-compile /home/rwurmus/guix/scripts/guix pull” is indeed the
> modified Guile, but I noticed that it spawns yet another Guile process
> to load and compile Guix.
>
> I guess that comes from the daemon? If that’s the case I can’t really
> test this on this big server, because the daemon is currently in use, so
> I can’t just reconfigure it to use the modified Guile.
Your patch above should have led to the use of “guile-awesome” to
compile Guix; I’m not sure why it didn’t.
> When compiling Guix from source with “make -j 32” using that version of
> Guile I got a segfault.
Oh?
Let’s put this on hold since Andy offers a different solution.
Thanks for testing!
Ludo’.
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, (continued)
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/25
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/25
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/26
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/26
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/26
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/27
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/28
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/30
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/30
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/30
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Andy Wingo, 2017/10/30
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/30
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Andy Wingo, 2017/10/31
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/31
- bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/26