[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18592: FFI should have portable access to ‘errno’
From: |
Nala Ginrut |
Subject: |
bug#18592: FFI should have portable access to ‘errno’ |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jan 2016 03:21:41 +0800 |
Here's updated patch
Thanks!
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 10:08 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> More specifically, here's what I'd suggest:
>
> * A new, static, 'pointer_to_procedure' C function that inherits the
> signature and body of 'scm_pointer_to_procedure' but with a new and
> required 'return_errno' argument. The other functions below would be
> wrappers for this function.
>
> * A new private 'scm_i_pointer_to_procedure_with_keywords' C function,
> defined using SCM_DEFINE and bound to 'pointer->procedure' in Scheme,
> that uses 'scm_c_bind_keyword_arguments' and calls
> 'pointer_to_procedure'.
>
> * The C API function 'scm_pointer_to_procedure', which has the same
> arguments as in Guile 2.0.11 and calls 'pointer_to_procedure' with
> 'return_errno' set to SCM_BOOL_F.
>
> * A new C API function 'scm_pointer_to_procedure_with_errno', which is
> identical to 'scm_pointer_to_procedure' except that it calls
> 'pointer_to_procedure' with 'return_errno' set to SCM_BOOL_T.
>
> The only change to foreign.h would be to add a prototype for
> 'scm_pointer_to_procedure_with_errno'.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
0001-Added-new-function-pointer-procedure-with-errno-to-r.patch
Description: Text Data
bug#18592: FFI should have portable access to ‘errno’, Mark H Weaver, 2016/01/04