bug#14511: Unexpected behaviour of scm_gc+sleep/usleep in another thread

[Ludovic Courtès]

Panicz Maciej Godek <address@hidden> skribis:

> Yes, you're right. Sleep does behave as documented, but I didn't expect
> that gc might raise a signal.
> Sorry for the confusion.

No problem.

> However, I replaced the libgc.so with a newly compiled one (7.2d) and
> nothing changed, so I guess that the reason might be more casual

Hmm yes.  Well, libgc can definitely resort to signals, but how it
chooses to do it is really an implementation detail, so I don’t know why
we’re seeing a difference here.

Ludo’.