[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13088: stack overflow while compiling
From: |
rixed |
Subject: |
bug#13088: stack overflow while compiling |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:33:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
-[ Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:29:31PM +0100, Stefan Israelsson Tampe ]----
> Anyway in vm.c I changed the
> #define VM_DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE (64 * 1024)
>
> to
> #define VM_DEFAULT_STACK_SIZE (64 * 1024 * 64)
>
> and recompiled!
Oh, I hadn't realized you were speaking about the VM's stack. It all makes
sense now.
Any inconvenient to set this stack even bigger ? How many such stacks do we
have in a running environment ? One per thread ?
> Then I can compile to tree-il. Compiling all the way does not work well,
> But if you enter
> scheme@(guile-user)> (compile program #:to 'value #:opts '(#:partial-eval?
> #f #:cse? #f)) ;;NO OPTIMIZATION PASSES
>
> It will compile to.
>
> $7 = #<procedure 3708400 (proto server-port client-zone server-zone
> signature-id)>
Yes, I did this and as a result the compiled function was... 20% faster !?
(note that my bench exclude the compilation time, and uses get-internal-run-time
as a clock source).
Thank you very much for all these advices.
As usual, support from free software community is much better than it is from
any business I've seen :-)