Re: Guile 2.0.0 manual extensions example

[Mark Harig]

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:50:58PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:

> The example in the Guile 2.0.0 manual, "Writing Guile
> Extensions", sec. 2.4, uses deprecated code, and does not
> indicate correct compiling options.
>
> Below is a modified code, which I compiled (Mac OS X
> 10.6.6) using
>  gcc `guile-config compile` `guile-config link` \
>  -dynamiclib -o libguile-bessel.so bessel.c
>
> Here, the guile-config part is necessary, as the headers
> are now in a subdirectory.  If excluded one will use the
> header from 1.8.
>

Andy Wingo reported that he had fixed the deprecated code in this
message (after Guile 2.0 was released):

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2011-02/msg00114.html

Also, there has been some discussion of using "guile-config"
versus "pkg-config".  Bruno Haible asked the question
"guile-config deprecated or not?", starting here:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2011-02/msg00117.html

---