Re: [PATCH] fix jump-misses-init warnings

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:

> In this case, though, nothing after the label uses the value of the
> variable for which the initialization is bypassed, so it seems okay.
> Though, I'd think the declaration could be left in the same scope, and
> just split into a declaration without initializer and a separate
> assignment statement; that would probably suppress the warning without
> triggering a used-before-set warning, and wouldn't require renaming
> all the other "n" variables.  (If it doesn't, I think it might be a
> smaller change to rename the variable for which the declaration is
> being moved, rather than all the others.)

I would prefer it.  Giuseppe: can you check whether it works for you?

Thanks,
Ludo’.