[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #14925] Non-portable binary compilations on linux
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[bug #14925] Non-portable binary compilations on linux |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:04:33 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=14925>
Summary: Non-portable binary compilations on linux
Project: Guile
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Mon 11/07/05 at 17:04
Category: None
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: None
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
_______________________________________________________
Details:
By default, when I built guile on my linux box (debian sarge). it uses the
"__libc_stack_end" symbol. This symbol is not portable. When I compile and
link my program with the guile libraries, and then try to move the binary to
a different linux platform (with a different version of GNU libc), the
program won't load with the error:
./no-repl: relocation error: ./no-repl: symbol __libc_stack_end, version
GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
ldd --version shows glic 2.3.2 on one box, 2.3.5 on the other (it also fails
between 2.3.2 and 2.3.3)
My solution was to rebuild guile, but remove the line
"#define HAVE_LIBC_STACK_END 1" from config.h before recompiling (after
reconfiguring)
After relinking my executeable with this new version of guile, it still
failed due to:
ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path:
ERROR: Unable to find file "ice-9/boot-9.scm" in load path
which meant I had to distribute along with the contents of
<install dir>/share/guile/1.6/
and set up run scripts to configure GUILE_LOAD_PATH before running my
executeable.
As __libc_stack_end is a non-portable symbol, I would like to see it not used
by default on the guile build. (or not used at all honestly)
Also, it would be nice if there was a way to statically link the file from
the share directory. If there already is and I just missed it while browsing
the documentation, I apologize, but I was unable to find it.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=14925>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #14925] Non-portable binary compilations on linux,
anonymous <=