Re: virtual host support

[Paul Jarc]

"Jose Roberto B. de A. Monteiro" <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Kevin Ryde" wrote:
>> "Jose Roberto B. de A. Monteiro" <address@hidden> writes:
>>>  -       (request (format #f "~A ~A ~A" method path http:version))
>>>  +       (request (format #f "~A ~A ~A\r\nHost: ~A" method path http:version
>>> (url:host url)))
>>
>> Perhaps the url:port should be included there too, at least if it's
>> not 80.

I agree.  I'd include it even if it is 80, for the sake of code
simplicity.

> The port was sent to make the connection, then it makes the request
> "GET ...".

Depending on how the server is configured, it might be convenient for
it to have the port in the Host: field as well.  It's better to send
information that is not needed than to not send information that is
needed.


paul